
Bringing Maine Women “Home for Good"
Avesta Housing and Preble Street work to
end homelessness.
“No one ever said being homeless is easy, but you shouldn’t
have to die from it.”
In
the weeks of late December and January, excitement rose as Preble
Street staff visited women at the City of Portland homeless shelter
to describe a plan to open a shelter just for them. This
was the first step to permanent housing at Florence House, a comprehensive
center for homeless women.
Florence House is an ambitious partnership between Avesta Housing
and Preble Street. It will provide permanent housing and emergency
shelter for homeless women. Avesta and Preble Street recently
announced the location of the project on Valley Street in Portland,
as well as funding commitments from MaineHousing. It
is slated to begin construction in early 2008.
With the recent closing of the YWCA, the need to find housing
options for homeless women became even more acute. Preble Street
responded by offering the use of their day shelter as an overnight
women’s shelter. On January 31, Preble Street closed
its drop-in center at 6:00 p.m. Staff then scrambled to scrub
floors and bathrooms and showers; move tables and chairs out; set
up and make 43 beds; and turned the lights down low. At 7:00
p.m. they re-opened as an overnight women’s shelter.
That night was the first time in 20 years that homeless women
in Portland (outnumbered by men 4 to 1) did not have to sleep on
mats on the floor in the city shelter. That night was also
the first step toward ensuring that homeless women in Portland
have a safe, respectful, and dignified permanent place to live.
The women welcomed that night are among the most vulnerable of
people on the street. When they first heard about the new
women’s shelter, many were wary. Although they had
often felt unsafe on the streets or uncomfortable in the cramped
quarters at Oxford Street, adjusting to new surroundings was intimidating. However,
since opening day, the women have started to create a sense of
community that didn’t exist before. Women who were
once isolated now look out for each other. A young woman
struggling with alcoholism has found comfort and peer support.
“The sense of ownership is inspiring,” according to
Amanda Wells, who is the women’s shelter coordinator. “One
woman in her 70s, who has been homeless for years, is working to
organize a chores list so clients can help keep the shelter clean.”
When I left the Preble Street Soup Kitchen
this morning, there were 182 people. 60 were women: some
were homeless girls who stay at the Preble Street Lighthouse Shelter;
others were women as old as 70.
Two days ago in that same space, we held a memorial service for
Jennifer, a 37-year-old woman who died outside - homeless and alone
- one night in December. Her friend, also a woman struggling
with homelessness, shared warm words about Jennifer and then added, “No
one ever said being homeless is easy, but you shouldn’t have
to die from it.”
Florence House will keep women alive. ‘Housing First’ models
work. At Logan Place we’ve been able to document success. People
who were homeless no longer are. Women who experience horrific,
debilitating mental illness begin to feel safe. Reduced hospital
costs; reduced police, fire, and ambulance costs; . . . [and] most
importantly, reduced fear of dying on the street in a parking lot
next to a dumpster.
from remarks by Donna Yellen, Preble Street Adult Services & Advocacy
Coordinator
While
the situation of homeless women is improved, the long-term goal
is to finally end chronic homelessness in Portland. It is a journey
Preble Street and Avesta began two years ago when they opened Logan
Place, a 30-unit apartment building for homeless people. Logan
Place succeeded beyond all expectations in its impact on the welfare
of the tenants, and the well-being of the community.
The next milestone will be achieved when Florence House opens. Florence
House will provide these women with their own home and support
services to help them maintain their stability. In the meantime,
Preble Street is creating relationships with the women who will
ultimately live in Florence House, relationships that will facilitate
the transition to Florence House.
The response from women clearly indicates that Florence House
is moving in the right direction. A resident that has been
on and off the streets for more than a decade remarked, "This
has been a wonderful change. It's changed people's attitudes. It's
changed how people feel."
The Florence House Development team includes a team of dedicated
young professional women in Portland:
Amy Donahoe, Preble Street
Amanda Wells, Preble Street
Debora Keller, Avesta Housing
Rebecca Dillon, Gawron Turgeon Architects
Betsy Melrose, Mitchell & Associates Landscape Architects
This article is the first in a series that will track the
new women’s shelter and the development of Florence House.
top

Successful Losers
by Beth Quinlan
A positive attitude is fundamental to the rest of Susan’s
recommendations. Successful losers believe they can lose weight.
Unrealistic expectations can undermine clients’ weight-loss
efforts. Lasting changes take time to become well established.
Many clients want to see quick results and that just isn’t
realistic.
Perhaps the only time when losing is synonymous with success is
in weight loss. While many of us are trying or wishing we could
lose weight, some are actually doing it. What can we learn from
these successful “losers”?
Registered Dietitian Susan Quimby, of Nutrition Works LLC in Portland,
has been helping people lose weight for almost 20 years, as well
as maintaining a twenty-five pound weight loss of her own. From
day one, Susan tells her clients, “Don’t do anything
to lose weight that you are not willing to do for the rest of your
life. What you do to lose the weight, you need to do to maintain
the loss.”
Attitude and Expectations
A positive attitude is fundamental to the rest of Susan’s
recommendations. Successful losers believe they can lose weight.
Unrealistic expectations can undermine clients’ weight-loss
efforts. Susan says, “Lasting changes take time to become
well established. Many clients want to see quick results and that
just isn’t realistic. If a client loses 30 pounds in a year,
I think that is terrific success, provided that she did it in a
healthy manner.”
Small Changes
According to Susan, her successful clients don’t take everything
on all at once. She recommends identifying one or two changes.
For example, establish a good breakfast and start walking. Other
areas to target for change are:
- Fats—Focus on monounsaturated fats and
Omega 3 fatty acids; avoid trans- and saturated fats.
- Vegetables—There is
no such thing as too many vegetables.
- Carbohydrates—All carbohydrates are
not bad; look for whole grains and limit or avoid refined
It should not be about deprivation. She urges clients to eat good
food—not to waste their calories on tasteless or unsatisfying
foods. “Eat real food. Take your time. Enjoy what you eat.
I have found that when clients consume foods that are satisfying,
they have a tendency to eat less.” Susan adds, “Clients
who are frequently snacking when not hungry or overeating at meal
times may need to develop effective strategies to change those
behaviors in order to achieve their goals.”
Planning
Planning ahead is another key to long-term success. To simplify
the planning process, Susan suggests finding two or three breakfast
options that work and choose from them. The same goes for lunch.
Susan recommends an afternoon snack with protein and a carbohydrate,
since six hours is too long to go without eating. Successful losers
don’t arrive
home at 6 p.m. with no idea what is for dinner. They have a plan
and the ingredients on hand so that it is easy for them to make
wise choices.
Portion Control
Portions are one of the chief ways Susan sees her clients unintentionally
undercut their own efforts. “People tend to underestimate
the amount of food they consume. A client will tell me they have
a serving of orange juice (4 ounces) but are actually consuming
8 or 12 ounces, or 1/2 cups of ice cream, when in reality it is
closer to 2 cups. If you do that throughout the day, those calories
add up, and you can be facing a weight gain even when you are being
careful about your food choices.” A site like the free www.Fitday.com,
where you can track consumption and calculate calories, can point
to areas where excess calories are interfering with weight loss.
Get Moving
Successful losers find ways to be active that they can enjoy and
stay with all year long. Susan delivers the news straight. “Like it or not, you need
to exercise—ideally 5 times per week,” she said. “I
tell my clients to start with 15 minutes per day. I don’t
care if you bowl, belly dance, or walk with a friend. You need
to find what works best for you—and not wait for motivation
to find you.”
When the focus is on making changes that will last and contribute
to good health, successful losers become successful maintainers.
And, in the end, that is the ultimate goal for those of us who
struggle with weight issues.
Here is what Successful “Losers” have to Say
“If I thought I was going to be on a diet for the rest of
my life, I would not do it. What I have learned is that by exercising
regularly, avoiding sugary foods, and controlling my portions,
I can lose weight. By taking those steps, I have not only lost
50 pounds but have cut out and reduced the medications I am on
for diabetes.”—Kay L., Portland
“With a young family and busy consulting business, my biggest
challenges were to find the time to exercise and to plan and prepare
meals I needed in order to reach my goals. The temptation to find
a ‘quick’ answer was finally outdone by the experience
that it never works. I just had to admit that this was the priority:
put myself higher on the list for a while, even when the time for
exercise or healthy eating reduced my time for work and family.
But it paid off. With 25 pounds gone, I have more energy
for all aspects of my life.”— Naomi M., Portland
“I reached a point in my life when I realized I couldn’t
live like this anymore. I have lost 75 pounds through wise food
choices, and I’m becoming a much more active person. It was
not easy, but it was so worth it. I feel wonderful!”—Suzanne
H., Brunswick
Elizabeth P. Quinlan lives and writes in Portland. When not
trying to figure how to work more vegetables into family meals,
she can be found at the gym or on the Boulevard, usually with
a friend
top

Advice on Screening for Down Syndrome
A negative screen does not rule out the possibility of having
a child with Down Syndrome. However, it does indicate that
the fetus is unlikely to be affected. Likewise, a positive
screening test does not indicate that the fetus has Down Syndrome,
but rather that fetus is at an increased risk for trisomy 21. In
fact, most screen-positive pregnancies for Down Syndrome will result
in a normal fetus
Down Syndrome, first described in 1866 - oddly enough by Dr. Down
- affects approximately 1 in 800 pregnancies. Individuals
with Down Syndrome have the additional 21 chromosome. The debilitating
nature of this disease has resulted in a variety of antenatal testing
strategies to detect affected fetuses. Major structural birth
defects and marked developmental delays have led to a desire to
try to detect this condition in utero. Certain diagnosis
can be made one of two ways: by a chorionic villous sampling (biopsy
of the placenta) at 10 to 13 weeks, or by amniocentesis which
samples amniotic fluid after 14 weeks. Both techniques result
in obtaining fetal cells for chromosomal analysis, and both procedures
carry a 1% risk of pregnancy loss. Since it is not practical
or desirable to perform invasive procedures on all pregnant women,
a variety of screening techniques has been used to select those
pregnant mothers at higher risk (of carrying a child with Down
Syndrome) for possible invasive testing.
Historically, age was used as the primary risk factor to base
whether or not a woman would be offered testing for Down Syndrome. While
it is true that the risk of trisomy 21 does increase with age (a
woman age twenty has a 1 in 2000 risk, while a woman age forty
five has a 1 in 15 risk), it is also true that most woman having
children are younger (less than the age of 35). Therefore
most infants born with trisomy 21 are going to be born to younger
mothers. Offering amniocentesis to women age greater than
or equal to age 35 or older, only detected approximately 35% of
all fetuses with trisomy 21. It also subjected 6 - 8 % of
women to having an amniocentesis. Fetal biochemical markers
for Down Syndrome -measured in maternal serum at around 16 weeks
of pregnancy - were added in the 1980s and 1990s. Maternal
age and analysis of these fetal-derived proteins (which are
made in different amounts by fetuses that have Down Syndrome) resulted
in 55 - 60% of Down Syndrome fetuses being diagnosed; with only
5 - 6% of all pregnant women being positive and undergoing invasive
testing.
Most recently, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
has stated clearly that all women should be offered chromosomal
testing regardless of age. They should be encouraged to be tested
on a risk-based approach. The latest version of the risk-based
approach involves obtaining biochemical markers and an ultrasound
measurement of the thickness of skin behind the neck of the fetus
between 11 and 13 weeks of gestation. If the first screen
is positive (at a risk of 1 in 220), the patient can elect to undergo
invasive testing or a later, more detailed, genetic ultrasound. The
newest version of this early testing combines more traditional
biochemical screening at 16 weeks, with the first screen at 10
- 13 weeks. Patients who are at a very high risk for Down
Syndrome at the initial screen are offered chorionic villous sampling.
Otherwise, a second maternal blood sample is obtained at 16 weeks,
and the risk for trisomy 21 is then calculated using both results. Once
again, approximately 5 - 6% of the pregnant population will screen
positive using this sequential approach, with detection rates for
trisomy 21 reaching the 90 - 95% range.
Several words of caution are in order. First, in order to
be reliable, the very early ultrasound needs to be performed using
meticulous technique. Measuring the fold of skin behind the
neck of a 10 to13-week fetus is not an easy task. Special
credentialing of the technician is required, along with a rigorous
quality assurance program. Secondly, patients need to understand
exactly what the tests can and cannot predict. A negative
screen does not rule out the possibility of having a child with
Down Syndrome. However, it does indicate that the fetus is
unlikely to be affected. Likewise, a positive screening test
does not indicate that the fetus has Down Syndrome, but rather
that fetus is at an increased risk for trisomy 21. In fact,
most screen-positive pregnancies for Down Syndrome will result
in a normal fetus. Medically speaking, it makes sense to
perform 20 or so procedures in order to find the one fetus that
has Down syndrome. The alternative is to not test for Down
Syndrome, or to test every one - only to find the one fetus with
Down Syndrome out of 800 tested.
Finally, it is important to understand that pregnancy, like life,
is full of uncertainties and potential risks. Every
time you drive a car, there is a risk of being involved in an accident -
even if you are the safest driver out there. Likewise, when
a pregnancy occurs, there are many potential risks to that unborn
child. Genetic conditions number into the thousands: preterm
delivery is always a possibility, and 2 % of fetuses will have
major birth defects. It is important to understand that we cannot
control all potential risks in life or in pregnancy, yet we can
try to undergo evaluations during pregnancy in a thoughtful and
sensible manner. Screening for chromosome abnormalities like
Down Syndrome is not meant to terrorize the pregnant couple. Rather
it is to inform and identify couples at a higher risk, and offer
them the potential of diagnosing a Down Syndrome fetus.

THE FLAB REPORT:
Itsy
Bitsy Teenie Weenie
by Danie Connolly
You couldn’t buy a better day. The
sun was shining, there was a nice breeze and the clouds were white
and fluffy- the kind that’s perfect for imaginations. I
had my grandsons; 2 and 4 years old, visiting for the weekend and
we planned to spend the day at the beach exploring tidal pools
and building sandcastles. Boys need their bulldozers,
dump trucks and cranes -we had enough equipment to start Big Dig
#2. With more toys than a moving van could tow, we trudged
across the sand like three unwise men lost in the desert. Finally
spying a port-a-potty and a gigantic sand dune, I wiped the sweat
from my brow and halted the little man caravan trailing behind.
“This is the most excellent spot for us,” I
announced, plopping down the blanket, a cooler loaded with food and a collection
of suntan lotions that Rite Aid and CVS couldn’t rival.
“Grammy, I’m going to find pennywinkles
and sandy dollars,” the oldest grandson proclaimed the moment he found
his pail and shovel.
“Why?” asked the littlest guy. It’s
amazing how many times in an hour a 2 year old can ask that same question.
“So we can buy ice cream!” the 4 year
old yelled ecstatically.
“Ice cream! Ice cream!” the 2 year old repeated, somehow
managing to repeat every answer and create a dance to go with it.
It was hysterical to watch him dance as he spun around, occasionally
leaping up and down as he repeated the words ‘ice cream’. I
could see people smiling as they watched this one man show. So
much for the carrot sticks and celery I packed.
“The ice cream man doesn’t come to this
beach.” I replied, trying to be the Grandmother setting the right example.
“Then how can this be the most excellent spot? My
teacher says excellent means the best.” The oldest wasn’t
buying into any Grammy act. Good question, I thought, but I wasn’t
pulling up our stakes.
“This is the most excellent spot,” I
tried to reason, “but Grammy shouldn’t eat ice cream because she’s
trying to be a good girl and stay on her diet. “ He paused a moment
to consider what I’d just declared- you could almost see his little brain
working overtime.
“Grammy, I’m going to make you dinner
for your diet with crabs and fishies. It’s a good thing.” (He’d
been watching Martha on TV just before we left).
“I don’t think I want to eat those itsy
bitsy teenie weenie crabs,” I told him while making a goofy face.
“Why?” The 2 year old was fully engaged
wanting to know why I’d pass on crabs and fishies; it sounded delicious
to him. A few muddy sand pies for dessert and what else could you want?
“Ahhhh… because Grammy likes lobster
better,” I offered as an excuse.
“Lobster! Lobster!” Again with the
dance – only this time he was pretending his hands were claws. He was
drawing a crowd with this comedy act of his.
I remember trying to convince my kids that lobsters
were big sea bugs. Nothing could deter them from ordering them at restaurants-
they were way too smart for me and their champagne taste far outspent my beer
budget.
Too many lobsters and too much butter was a dangerous combo for
my waistline, but I was still smiling from the fact I shared a
sentence with itsy bitsy teenie weenie – regardless if it
had nothing to do with yellow polka dot bikinis.
We sat on the blanket with this beautiful day all
around us, and enjoyed our PBJ’s and cut fruit. Afterwards, we
made several sandcastles with first class moats and driftwood flag poles Donald
Trump would have envied.
The day was getting hotter and it was time to get
wet.
“Let Grammy put more sun lotion on you before
we go in the water,” I cautioned. No one was getting sunburned
on my watch.
“Are you going to put on your bathing suit,
Grammy?” the oldest queried.
“No sweetheart,” I answered, picturing
that I look like a beached whale in the swimsuits I owned.
“Grammy isn’t going to wear her bathing
suit today,” I added.
“Why?” the little voice inquired for the
200th time.
“Because Grammy’s Fat!” the 4 year
old shouted for the world to hear.
“Grammy’s Fat! Grammy’s Fat!” the
littlest one echoed loudly, jumping up and down and entertaining the beach
with his latest dance. Oh…excellent.
top
|